Daily Kos

The Liberal Media: You might have heard of us

Fri Feb 03, 2006 at 03:00:12 PM PDT

Cross-posted at MyDD

My local Generation DFA group is working on putting out a newsletter every other week.  The first edition (below the fold) is in the works right now, and will be printed and distributed in a week and a half.  I think this is something that people can do anywhere (you can even use/edit our newsletter) to make an impact in their local communities.

The newsletter itself will be pretty short: only one page front and back.  Each edition will have a particular topic, with the first being the Republican Culture of Curruption.  The key is that we will both talk about the Republican screwups on the issue, and the Democratic/progressive attempts to solve it.  It will be short, light-hearted, and easy to read, but it will also contain solid information.

More below the fold...

We're targetting the newsletter to two separate groups at our college campus:
  1. Apathetics/I-hate-politics/I-hate-politicians type people
  2. Democrats/progressives/liberals who could read it, nod their heads along the way, and reach the end where they see a call to action and an invitation to join our DFA meetings.

We may decide as time goes on to include a short blurb with a bit of local flavor, as well.  We'll also have a small section called the "Conservative humor corner," with funny "jokes" like Ann Coulter saying someone should poison a Supreme Court Justice, or blaming natural disasters on gays.  We have not written that part yet for the first edition.

We are looking for some feedback and suggestions on a few things, so please read with this in mind:

  1. The title - we want to be lighthearted, but we also don't want to be seen as the counter to the local Conservative rag that is full of indignant outrage.  Any suggestions for an alternative title/tagline would be greatly appreciated.
  2. Does our newsletter successfully appeal to both audiences mentioned above?

THE LIBERAL MEDIA
You might have heard of us.

Lobbyists: Idiots or Troglodytes
    Hey you.  Given our dismal voter turnout in past decades, chances are most of our readership doesn't think too much about politics.  We at GenDFA realize this, and understand that you're probably reading this to get you through PSYC 100 or whatever gen-ed your advisor's been hassling you about. We've all got our reasons for disgust with politics (and believe me, those of us who are active have our share of disgust), but it seems like the biggest reason is that we don't think our government works for us.
    What would give the non-voting public that impression?    Perhaps it's the vast influence that money has on the political process.  Take a good look at the photo above. Do you recognize the man in it? If you don't, we don't blame you. He's a big part of the problem. His name is Jack Abramoff, and recently the American public has seen him cross a number of acceptable boundaries in lobbying. By taking Congressmen such as former House Republican leader Tom DeLay on golf trips to Scotland and exotic islands that were as much pleasure as they were business, this lobbyist succeeded often in bending Congress to his will, getting special exceptions for his clients. Sounds like the sort of guy you want working for you, eh? Not quite. Jack Abramoff treated several of his clients like there was no "Abram" in his name. For his clients in several Native American tribes, Abramoff overcharged more than $80 million for his services, at once lobbying against the casinos he claimed to be helping them build. In private, he derided his trusting clients, referring to them as "idiots" and "troglodytes."  Abramoff, however, has no problem dealing with his good buddies in our Republican-controlled Congress.
    Some may say that this is a bipartisan scandal. I'm sure we all have a friend, let's call him `Leo,' who will claim Democrats are as deeply entrenched as Republicans. Not so, Leo! Some Indian tribes, like most other organizations, gave money to both Democrats and Republicans.  After Abramoff began lobbying for some of them, though, the tribes started directing twice as much money to Republicans, and less of it to Democrats. Abramoff himself, however, never gave a dime to Democrats. He is, after all, good friends with our Republican Congress, and you can bet he isn't alone in uglying up our political process.

(image stolen from Happy Monkey at DailyKos)
    Some Republicans are making empty claims toward lobbying reform, like tattletales with their hands caught in the cookie jar. Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) - famous for pushing total Republican control of the lobbying industry - is now the Republicans' point man on ethics reform - the worst appointment to a job since they put an Arabian Horse show judge in charge of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. You're doin' a heck of a job, Ricky.
    So who do we look to to clean up government? Who can we trust to run a government we care about? Here's a hint: It's not the guys on golf trips.

Taking the Money out of Politics

    Recently, the Democrats have made some valiant attempts at cleaning up the ethics scandals and restoring trust in Washington today.  Democratic leaders got together in January to propose the Honest Leadership & Open Government Act, which would, among other things, lengthen the amount of time before someone can go from being a politician to a lobbyist, increase transparency when dealing with lobbyists, ban gifts and travel from lobbyists, and eliminate cronyism in appointed government positions.
    While these are all great steps towards cleaning up Washington, the root of this problem (like most) is money.  Politicians need it for their campaigns, and corporations, the wealthy, and the powerful are willing to give it in exchange for their loyalty.  That's why the best type of reform possible is to eliminate the need for money in campaigns to begin with.
    To that end, Democratic Congressmen Barney Frank (MA) and Dave Obey (WI) are proposing the Grassroots Clean Campaign Act. This legislation will establish publicly-financed campaigns, which will eliminate the loopholes and contribution laws that allow corrupt lobbyists to buy our Congress.  With this system, no longer will the amount of money one owns be a factor in how powerful their voice is when it comes around to election time.  While this sounds like a radical departure from our current system (and it is), it is also one that is currently in place in the states of Maine and Arizona, with huge success.  There, politicians and the people agree that they feel more connected and their voices better heard.
    How can we help this democratic process along? Well, we can call our Senators and Representatives. Their offices are easily contacted, and after all, if they're going to speak for you, they really ought to hear from you.

Senator Barack Obama - (202) 224-2854
Senator Dick Durbin - (202) 224-2152
Representative Tim Johnson - (202) 225-2371

Call them and ask them to support the Frank-Obey "Grassroots Clean Campaign Act" to get money out of politics. A little pressure can go a long way.

If you think cleaning up the corruption in Washington is important, join Generation Democracy for America. We're working to fix some of the problems in Washington on a local level, and we're having fun in the process!  We meet every other Sunday, and our next meeting is February 28 at 6:00pm in 207 Gregory Hall.

For more info, visit www.dfalink.com/uiuc.

The biggest obstacle we face with the newsletter is distribution.  At the moment, the best method of distribution that we've been able to come up with is putting a stack on the distribution rack in the student union, and leaving copies randomly laying around on desks in the large lecture halls, on couches in popular meeting areas, etc.  If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.

I think it could be good if other groups did a similar thing, and I would be perfectly fine with (and honored by!) other groups simply using our newsletter and/or editing it for their purposes.  Please give me some feedback, and let me know if you think this is a good idea :)

Tags: activism, culture of corruption, DFA (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 13 comments

  •  Tip jar, suggestions, comments? (4.00 / 2)

    Please let me know what you think :)
  •  Do you have a major transportation (none / 0)

    center nearby?  You know, Amtrak station or local transportation hub?  People are always looking for something to read while they are waiting for a train.
  •  I am so totally bogarting this idea (none / 0)

    I'm hoping to organize a group for activism - for people who wouldn't normally consider being activists. Soccer parents, mainstreamers, so forth. This idea would, I think, bolster that effort enormously.

    I think working up a newsletter sort of thing and seeing if I can put it on the counters of local businesses, maybe leave some around Metro stations in the area, would be fantastic. Thanks for the idea!

    •  my pleasure (none / 0)

      Feel free to steal whatever you want from it.  Of course you may want to edit it a bit to fit your local situation (your audience probably won't sitting through PSYCH 100).

      What do you think about the title?
      Any ideas for distribution?

      •  I LOVE the title! (none / 0)

        And wish I could think of something half as clever - and true. It's about time somebody took up the name and did something with it - if we're gonna be accused of having a liberal media, we might as well finally get it.

        I think distributing it around colleges is a great idea! Also, are there small businesses around where you are that might let you put it on their counters for distribution - like Chinese take-out places, where people are waiting around and might like something to read? Independent coffeehouses? Dry cleaners? Doctors' offices? Insurance offices?

        Maybe post notices on grocery store and college bulletin boards that have a link to an online version.

        What about churches and church groups? Libraries? Civic organizations that might be willing to distribute the newsletter to their members?

        Would you be willing to undertake a mailing operation? Maybe you could build a mailing list (opt-in, not opt-out). Have you talked with your local Democratic Party folks? They might be able to give you some ideas.

        I'll probably be talking about this wacky new newsletter idea with Mr. Puckish tonight, and he's always got better ideas than I do, so if he has any thoughts about how to get it out there, I'll pass it along.

  •  Brilliant! (none / 0)

    First, I think your title and tag line are fantastic.  Light hearted and a little tongue in cheek, while letting your audience know exactly where you're coming from.  You manage to maintain the conversational tone thru out, so people aren't going to see you as a direct response to the other paper for long.

    As far as market appeal, you'll have no problem with your second demographic.  However, I don't really see a draw for the apathetic and anti-politic.  A certain percentage of those will simply be beyond your means to reach.  You might consider aiming more for the disenfranchised group: draw them in by making a point of showing how involvement can lead to enfranchisement, how change is made by action and involvement, how you/our goals match their goals.  By attracting the disenfranchised, you'll probably pick up some of the apolitical anyways, and I think your message will be a little less diluted by not trying to directly appeal to too large an audience.

    Tackling Abramoff first thing out of the gate strikes me as a bit ambitious.  I would think that leading with what Bushco is doing to student loans might be a bit more immediate to your audience.
    Well, that's my two cents.  Hope some of it is useful.  I'll be interested to here how it goes...it's definitely an easily transplanted idea, and we have no shortage of college campuses here in Chicago that might prove fertile soil.

    -8.38, -6.21 If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention

    by Mat in IL on Fri Feb 03, 2006 at 03:44:43 PM PDT

    •  good comments (none / 0)

      How do you think we could go about retargetting this for the disenfranchised?  Does it not appeal to them as is, or should we make some changes?

      One of the biggest reasons for this newsletter is for recruitment purposes, so anything that we get beyond that is kind of an extra bonus.  

      About the topic, I did consider doing the student loans thing, but since our (R) congressman was one of the few to vote against that bill, it doesn't have much of a local appeal to it.  On the other hand, Tim Johnson has taken plenty of money from Tom DeLay and voted multiple times to weaken ethics rules, so it's pretty easy to tie him into this one.  That reminds me... we should put a short blurb about how this relates locally...

      I'll try to provide an update on how things went and what the reaction was like.

      •  now i'm not so sure they were good comments. (none / 0)

        After a couple more readings, I find that your article might not be as off-target to the disenfranchised as I thought.  I found a counter to almost each criticism I originally had.  I think your greatest difficulty might be getting them to stick with you to page two, where you ask for their support (and I don't really have anything like a solution for that).  I would definately go for the local angle, and go there early.  

        -8.38, -6.21 If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention

        by Mat in IL on Fri Feb 03, 2006 at 04:23:45 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Re: asking for their support (none / 0)

          the part where we ask for them to call Congressmen, and for them to join our meetings is intended for the readers who already agree with us.  I know we won't be getting any of those apathetics/disenfranchised people to show up at a progressive activists meeting after reading a page and a half, but we can get some liberals who don't know about us to join in.  We did try pretty hard to keep it a short and easy read (could easily be read in about 5 minutes) to keep people's attention, and so that it can be read on the bus, in class, whatever.  We're not looking for a long drawn-out diatribe like that other paper on campus.

Permalink | 13 comments